Perfect Rest

There is noth­ing in her appear­ance but per­fect rest. You would sup­pose her qui­etly asleep.”

— Charles Dick­ens in a let­ter to his wife, Cather­ine, break­ing the news gen­tly about their 8-month old daughter’s death.

Read the entire let­ter. One of the most painful let­ters any­one would have ever had to write.

Read­ing is an act of resis­tance in a land­scape of dis­trac­tion.… It requires us to pace our­selves. It returns us to a reck­on­ing with time. In the midst of a book, we have no choice but to be patient, to take each thing in its moment, to let the nar­ra­tive pre­vail. We regain the world by with­draw­ing from it just a lit­tle, by step­ping back from the noise.”

— David Ulin via How to Sur­vive The Age of Distraction

Vessels

The ves­sels we cre­ate often deter­mine the things that con­tain them. Also, chang­ing the ves­sel can change our per­cep­tion and our expe­ri­ence and what we place in them.”

— Patrick Rhone in Ves­sels, Names, and Frames

If you are the mes­sen­ger, remem­ber: the medium is as impor­tant as the message.

Accident-aa?

Secu­rity Guard: STOP[points to my feet] No chap­pal allowed.

Me: Uhh…

Guard: San­dals not allowed. Go back, change and come.

Me: Err… Really? I stay at BTM… So far!… And imag­ine the traf­fic at this hour! Are you sure you want to put me through this?

Guard: Go back, change and come.

Me: But I wore these accidentally…

Guard: Accident-aa?

Me: Yeah, yes! Accident!

Guard: Okay. No problem.

Me: [mut­ters as I walk past the check­point] Achieve­ment unlocked!

 

Even Steve Jobs Used Slide Decks

Peo­ple who know what they are talk­ing about don’t need PowerPoint.”

— Steve Jobs quoted in Wal­ter Isaacson’s mem­oir Steve Jobs.

This quote has become fairly pop­u­lar after it was fea­tured in a post by Pre­sen­ta­tionZen. If you think there is rea­son enough to ban slide decks alto­gether, I’d say no.

I too, like most white-collared work­ers, have been sub­jected to one too many sleep-inducing pre­sen­ta­tions with wordy slide decks that never seemed to end. But are we right in blam­ing Pow­er­Point? Isn’t it just a tool that is harm­ful when it falls into the wrong hands? Shouldn’t we be blam­ing poor pre­sen­ters instead?

The hypocrisy of Steve’s state­ment is evi­dent when you real­ize that he loved using slides:

We had one rule that really both­ered him: We never allowed slides, which were his main pre­sen­ta­tion tool.

One year, about an hour before his appear­ance, I was informed that he was back­stage prepar­ing dozens of slides, even though I had reminded him a week ear­lier of the no-slides pol­icy. I asked two of his top aides to tell him he couldn’t use the slides, but they each said they couldn’t do it, that I had to. So, I went back­stage and told him the slides were out. Famously prickly, he could have stormed out, refused to go on. And he did try to argue with me.”

— Walt Moss­berg in The Steve Jobs I Knew

Yes, the very same per­son who appears to be blam­ing slide decks was irri­tated when he was not allowed to use them.

Of course, there is a dif­fer­ence between Steve’s slide deck and the com­mon office meet­ing slide deck. Steve’s were always beau­ti­ful and often nar­rated a story. A suc­cess­ful pre­sen­ta­tion is noth­ing but a story well told. And slides can help you in the sto­ry­telling process if you use it right.

By blam­ing “Pow­er­Point”, Steve is just pok­ing fun at a prod­uct devel­oped by Apple’s com­peti­tor, Microsoft. He could just as well have men­tioned Keynote (or sim­ply ‘slides’) but he didn’t. He phrased his words in a way that peo­ple would iden­tify with and, at the same time, show Apple’s com­peti­tors in a poor light.

That was the genius of Steve Jobs. And every­one fell for it.

Critic

The wall is an equal­izer. It doesn’t mat­ter how long you spent or how hard you tried. What’s on the wall is all there is. When we pub­lish, we open a line of engage­ment where crit­i­cism is an option, so we must learn to not only receive the feed­back of oth­ers, but learn to give it in a civil, artic­u­late, and help­ful way.

— Frank Chimero in The Wall

Before we slit each other’s throats in debates while insult­ing oth­ers’ per­sonal choices and tastes, let’s pause—take a deep breath—and think really hard about how we speak or write.

Rahul Dravid’s Bradman Oration

If you haven’t read, heard or seen Rahul Dravid’s speech yet, you are miss­ing out on one of the most poignant speeches ever made. He is as wise and insight­ful in his speech as he is on the crease.

Cowbird

Cow­bird makes it easy for any­one to tell beau­ti­ful sto­ries — incor­po­rat­ing text, pho­tog­ra­phy, sound, sub­ti­tles, maps, tags, time­lines, char­ac­ters, roles, and ded­i­ca­tions — as you keep a diary of your life.

Cow­bird is also pio­neer­ing a new form of par­tic­i­pa­tory jour­nal­ism, allow­ing peo­ple all over the world to col­lab­o­rate in chron­i­cling the over­ar­ch­ing “sagas” that shape our lives today.

— Jonathan Har­ris on Cow­bird

Jonathan’s Today is one among the few photo-blogs that I fol­low reg­u­larly. One photo every day and a beau­ti­ful story to go with it. Some­thing I’ve wanted to do myself in rameeznooruddin.com/photo but never got the hang of it yet.

Jonathan’s lat­est project, Cow­bird, is sort of an anti-social-network. Shun­ning the likes of com­ments, retweets, likes, +1’s and any­thing of that sort, the spot­light is on the con­tent – your stories.

The tim­ing of Cowbird’s launch is just per­fect. There’s a grow­ing sen­ti­ment that the cur­rent “social” behe­moth has become noisy, clut­tered and focused on min­ing users’ data for adver­tis­ers’ sake. The New York Times recently ran a story about peo­ple who have quit Face­book 1 and are happy about it. I think it is time we explored other def­i­n­i­tions of “social” on the web.

You can use Cow­bird like a jour­nal or blog with pho­tos and brief nar­ra­tives (text/audio) to go along with it. Things become more inter­est­ing when these sto­ries become a part of a big­ger event like the Occupy move­ment. The sto­ries are inter­wo­ven into beau­ti­ful col­lages called “Sagas” and the nar­ra­tive is often quite compelling.

Cow­bird is about both you as an indi­vid­ual and you as a part of the fab­ric of soci­ety. Isn’t that what social is all about?


  1. I had deac­ti­vated my account a few months ago but went back sheepishly.

Business is Personal

Joe Fox: It wasn’t… per­sonal.
Kath­leen Kelly: What is that sup­posed to mean? I am so sick of that. All that means is that it wasn’t per­sonal to you. But it was per­sonal to me. It’s *per­sonal* to a lot of peo­ple. And what’s so wrong with being per­sonal, any­way?
Joe Fox: Uh, noth­ing.
Kath­leen Kelly: What­ever else any­thing is, it ought to begin by being personal.

— scene from You’ve Got Mail.

Some­thing at office yes­ter­day reminded me of this movie. When I saw it for the first time, I paid no atten­tion to the busi­ness and ide­ol­ogy part of the story. Now I do and I find it fascinating.

Undying Patience

Through Nick’s drug addic­tion, I learned that par­ents can bear almost any­thing. Every time we reach a point where we feel as if we can’t bear any more, we do.

– David Sheff in My Addicted Son